Mexico, Florida tomato interests continue to spar

Growers and importers of Mexican tomatoes and segments of the U.S. tomato industry continue to spar over a Department of Commerce decision to end an agreement that holds an anti-dumping investigation at bay.

E61BDB55-A81D-4877-A609AD18C0620475.png
E61BDB55-A81D-4877-A609AD18C0620475.png
(File photo)

Growers and importers of Mexican tomatoes and segments of the U.S. tomato industry, along with U.S. legislators, continue to spar over a Department of Commerce decision to end an agreement that holds an anti-dumping investigation at bay.

On one side, U.S. tomato growers, most prominently in Florida, charge that Mexican imports have skirted the agreement and are threatening the existence of their industry. On the other side, the Fresh Produce Association of the Americas said dropping the agreement could threaten up to 33,000 U.S. jobs and cause tomato price hikes at grocery stores.

In a mid-March letter to the Commerce Department, the FPAA said the department’s decision to drop the suspension agreement on May 7 would have immediate effect, citing a University of Arizona study.

“Even a 5% reduction in supplies of Mexican tomatoes would result in consumers paying up to 25 cents more per pound at supermarkets, or up to $790 million more per year for tomatoes,” according to the letter, attributed to the FPAA board of directors.

“The truth appears to be that leaders of the Florida Tomato Exchange (FTE) are on a campaign to portray themselves as the victims to trade while leveraging U.S. trade law to corner the market and drive out competition,” FPAA President Lance Jungmeyer said in a news release.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and five Congressmen from the state responded to criticism of the Commerce Department’s decision, releasing a series of statements on the issue.

“Washington’s willingness to sacrifice entire domestic industries and local production just to shave pennies off the costs that American consumers might pay for products is one of the main reasons why Donald Trump is president today,” Rubio said in a news release. “ … We cannot stand by as some profit from unfair fruit and vegetable imports directly at the expense of their neighbors and countrymen.”

Rep. Neal Dunn said he applauds the Trump administration for “putting domestic growers first.”

“The data is overwhelmingly clear, Mexico has been waging an assault on southeastern tomato producers for years– and getting away with it,” Dunn said in the release.

Rep. Ross Spano said that tomato imports are not the only issue.

“Much like tomato growers, strawberry growers in my district are under attack from illegal ‘dumping’ practices and are unable to defend themselves under present treaties, he said in the statement.

Related articles:

Letter: Clarifying the tomato suspension situation

Mexican tomato growers challenge Commerce Department

U.S. withdrawing from tomato suspension agreement with Mexico

The Packer logo (567x120)
Related Stories
The request allocates $10 billion to row and specialty crop producers for crops planted in 2026, with the remaining $1.1 billion designated for Florida farmers hit by winter storms in late 2025 and early 2026.
Fresh from securing key advocacy wins, the International Fresh Produce Association CEO brought a clear message to the recent Washington Conference: The produce industry’s voice is actively shaping federal policy, but the fight for fresh is far from over.
Federal officials unveil a roadmap to slash fresh fruit and vegetable imports by scaling domestic production and challenging grocery sector consolidation.
Read Next
Rochelle Bohm of CMI Orchards discusses the threat that extended producer responsibility laws pose to the fresh produce industry and why the high cost of sustainable packaging will be passed on to consumers.
Get Daily News
GET MARKET ALERTS
Get News & Markets App