The Environmental Working Group has again released its "Dirty Dozen" list. ( Graphic made with Adobe Spark )

The Environmental Working Group has again named strawberries, spinach and kale as the first three items on its polarizing “Dirty Dozen” list.

The EWG bases its list — which is not peer-reviewed — on pesticide residue data gathered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA’s Pesticide Data Program has repeatedly found, year after year, that more than 99% of products sampled have no detectable residue or residue that is below tolerance levels established by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Past "Dirty Dozen" and "Clean 15"

EWG releases 2019 'Dirty Dozen,' 'Clean 15' lists
2018 "Dirty Dozen" and "Clean 15" lists released
2017 "Dirty Dozen" and "Clean 15" lists released

 

 

 

 

 

The fresh produce industry has long argued that the Dirty Dozen list is harmful because it discourages people from eating fresh produce, which is critical to good health and especially essential in combating obesity and other diet-related diseases prevalent in the U.S. Peer-reviewed research has shown this effect is particularly damaging for lower-income households.

Teresa Thorne, executive director of the Alliance for Food and Farming, which aims to provide science-based messaging on produce safety to consumers, called on EWG president Ken Cook last week to not release the list, as doing so adds more anxiety — unnecessarily, she said — to an already anxious time given the spread of the new coronavirus COVID-19.

Related: A healthy-food journalist comes clean

Thorne wrote the following in an open letter to Cook:

“Your announced plan to release the so-called ‘Dirty Dozen’ list under current circumstances is misguided and concerning. As you are well aware, this list is not only scientifically unsupportable, but peer-reviewed research has shown it negatively impacts consumers and discourages consumption because it erroneously raises produce safety fears.

“On behalf of the organic and conventional farmers we represent, we ask that you rethink your decision to release and promote this list due to its undermining effect on health efforts to increase consumption of the very foods we are urged to eat more of to boost immunity and prevent illness. Now is not the time to release more inaccurate and fear-based messaging into an already anxiety-ridden world.

“In addition, your list has been repeatedly discredited by scientists. A peer-reviewed analysis has shown that your organization follows no established scientific procedures in the development of the so-called list. Moreover, this analysis found that your list’s recommendations to substitute organic forms of produce for conventional forms does not reduce risk to consumers simply because residues are so low, if present at all, on conventional fruits and vegetables.

“Further, calling fruits and vegetables ‘dirty’ is exceptionally disrespectful to organic and conventional fruit and vegetable farmers. These are the farmers who continue to work hard every day to ensure Americans (as well as citizens in other countries) have an adequate and accessible supply of food in these very troubling and uncertain times. It should be noted that the government has deemed farmers and farm employees as ‘essential’ to our nation’s security — something most of us have recognized for a long, long time.

“Mr. Cook, we all must adapt to this evolving environment, make difficult decisions and change. We have called on you previously to abandon releasing this list. But, now more than ever, we ask for your leadership to stop your organization’s practice of knowingly stoking misplaced food safety fears and denigrating the work of farmers through the release of this list.

“Now is the time to put consumers first and support their choices whether they choose organic or conventionally grown produce. Now is the time to use your organization’s considerable resources to help promote a healthy diet that is rich in fruits and vegetables. With only 1 in 10 Americans eating enough each day, the EWG could help make positive and important strides in improving diets. Please do the right thing.”

The preventative power of fruits and vegetables is well documented. A peer-reviewed study in Nutrition Today in 2016 even found that, if just half of Americans ate one more serving of fruit or vegetables daily, 20,000 cases of cancer could be prevented each year.

Related: Why we write about the 'Dirty Dozen'

At the very end of its news release on the Dirty Dozen list, EWG also noted the importance of fruits and vegetables overall.

“As all Americans struggle to adapt to the reality of daily life during the spread of the coronavirus pandemic, it is important to know that there is no evidence people can be exposed through food,” EWG wrote in the release. “That is why, even though the risks of COVID-19 are serious, consumers should continue to eat plenty of healthy fruits and vegetables, whether they are conventional or organic.”

The EWG “Dirty Dozen” list includes:

The EWG “Clean 15” list includes:

For more perspective on this topic, check out the following articles, two of which are from dietitians, plus one from a horticultural scientist:

Abby Langer Nutrition — The EWG’s Dirty Dozen and Clean Fifteen: Is it Really Reliable?

Kevin M. Folta  A Half Dozen Reasons to Reject the “Dirty Dozen”

Victoria Shanta Retelny — A Dietitian's Take On the "Dirty Dozen" - Illinois Farm Families

 

 
Comments
Submitted by R Henry on Wed, 03/25/2020 - 14:38

EWG is nothing but a political action group. It does NOT deserve serious consideration here or anywhere else.

Submitted by Em Allyn on Wed, 03/25/2020 - 22:28

Honestly? This is so irresponsible on the part of EWG. If they are so concerned about so-called environmental concerns they ought instead to look at the practices of farms producing meat. Raising animals for meat represents an actual threat to health and safety of Americans and the world, whereas the farming of fruits and vegetables is fundamental to all life on Earth. Shame on these people.

Submitted by Deb on Tue, 03/31/2020 - 13:22

Really?!?! You think that spraying pesticides, herbicides and many other poisons on our fruits and vegetables is something you consider "so-called environmental concerns"? They aren't in the business of meat. Let them do what they are good at and get to the back of the line!! You should be the one who is shamed!!

In reply to by Em Allyn (not verified)

Submitted by RJ on Thu, 04/30/2020 - 16:07

This the same type of response you would get if you asked IMPOTUS a simple question. For the the question and divert it to another topic. Well played!

In reply to by Em Allyn (not verified)

Submitted by Jerry Todd on Sat, 04/04/2020 - 09:20

We have to stop wasting our time with these nut cake environmental groups. Usually a small group working out of the basement maybe with George Soros money maybe not. All they do is undermined the work of honest people.

Submitted by wendy on Tue, 04/14/2020 - 18:36

nice!

Submitted by Tom W on Mon, 04/20/2020 - 15:24

Who do you believe? now days do you ever ask what is the truth? Everyone has an opinion including me and all the above! But that doesn't make it the truth.
Let's be careful and make the best decisions we can with the information we have and stop being so critical of those who disagree with us.

Submitted by Peggy on Sun, 04/26/2020 - 14:33

I respect and Trust the environmental working group

Submitted by Jeri Mick on Sun, 04/26/2020 - 21:15

I applaud the EWG for standing firm. If more groups were out their putting pressure on farmers, maybe all our produce would be safe for our families and their future health. Keep up the good work.

Submitted by Amy on Tue, 04/28/2020 - 09:16

Funny that farming with the use of pesticides is considered the “conventional” as though it’s been done this way since the dawn of time.

In reply to by Jeri Mick (not verified)

Submitted by Susie Frederickson on Thu, 05/07/2020 - 23:03

Such a helpful resource!! So many people are interested in the information and use it as a handy reference.

Submitted by Tom on Thu, 05/28/2020 - 18:09

I personally do not trust the EPA due to the fact it said the air was clean near wall st after 911 and were trying to get my company to not wear protective masks. So anything from the EPA has no credibility. How about a list That gives us the amount of pesticides found on items period . Let us decide if something is too much . How about an official certification on how food I’d grown period . If it meets the level of organic for pesticides it gets a USDA low pesticides stamp. Would take the bite out of the dirty dozen

Submitted by TL on Sun, 06/21/2020 - 15:23

Can you explain how sweet corn is on the clean list? Isn’t most corn Monsanto GMO seeds so that round-up and other poisons can be sprayed and used as desiccants? Please clarify! Thanks.

Submitted by Melanie Everson on Sun, 07/12/2020 - 05:41

I don’t see oranges on either good list or bad list. Please clarify.

Submitted by Monique on Sun, 08/09/2020 - 20:05

This article is shameless and inexcusable in it's promotion of agricultural practices which harm the earth and our bodies IMMESURABLY. No doubt the long arm of Industrial Ag has in some way paid for and sponsored this garbage to be written. Some of us want the right to eat food that is as healthy and non toxic as what our grandparents grew up with as normal - not the poisoned, earth killing profit making venom that is now hidden inside most everything we eat. I celebrate and support EWG in their courage and tenacity to research and get out the truth. Pesticide residues harm not only the consumers who eat them, but they also do unbelievable harm to the farmworkers who have to be in contact with them day and day out. Do your own research folks, and make sure you aren't listening to industry paid shrills like this "article"

Submitted by Monique on Sun, 08/09/2020 - 20:06

This article is shameless and inexcusable in it's promotion of agricultural practices which harm the earth and our bodies IMMESURABLY. No doubt the long arm of Industrial Ag has in some way paid for and sponsored this garbage to be written. Some of us want the right to eat food that is as healthy and non toxic as what our grandparents grew up with as normal - not the poisoned, earth killing profit making venom that is now hidden inside most everything we eat. I celebrate and support EWG in their courage and tenacity to research and get out the truth. Pesticide residues harm not only the consumers who eat them, but they also do unbelievable harm to the farmworkers who have to be in contact with them day and day out. Do your own research folks, and make sure you aren't listening to industry paid shrills like this "article"

Submitted by Monique on Sun, 08/09/2020 - 20:06

This article is shameless and inexcusable in it's promotion of agricultural practices which harm the earth and our bodies IMMESURABLY. No doubt the long arm of Industrial Ag has in some way paid for and sponsored this garbage to be written. Some of us want the right to eat food that is as healthy and non toxic as what our grandparents grew up with as normal - not the poisoned, earth killing profit making venom that is now hidden inside most everything we eat. I celebrate and support EWG in their courage and tenacity to research and get out the truth. Pesticide residues harm not only the consumers who eat them, but they also do unbelievable harm to the farmworkers who have to be in contact with them day and day out. Do your own research folks, and make sure you aren't listening to industry paid shrills like this "article"

Submitted by Nicolle Langworthy on Mon, 10/19/2020 - 08:19

This is very interesting !