Some, but far from all, produce operators have optimism about President Biden’s plans to put in place policies that will give growers a “green new deal” to help reduce greenhouse gases.
The Packer recently asked produce companies “Are you optimistic that a “green new deal” from the Biden administration could benefit growers seeking to reduce their carbon footprint? Why or why not?”
Olga Borquez, sustainability manager for Wholesum, said she is optimistic about Biden’s Build Back Better plan.
“I hope it will allow for more green grants in rural areas,” she said.
Any tools that growers can use to improve their farming operations and help the environment are always appreciated, said Chris Ford, business development and marketing manager for Viva Tierra, Sedro Wooley, Wash.
Wyatt Maysey, sustainability manager for Taylor Farms, Salinas, Calif., said Biden’s plan may bring “good incentives but messy regulations.”
There is potential in Biden’s still-emerging policies, said Dane Dickerson, marketing director of Fusionware. “However, I’m concerned that the technological barriers to proving an operation is sustainable will price out small and medium-sized firms from partaking in whatever programs are constructed.”
Michael Agostini, owner of Miago Produce Industry Services, said the focus should be on industry initiatives.
“The political aspects are a big concern already,” Agostini said.
“We don’t need more government involvement. Let us, the industry, academia, NGOs and science figure it out in a true, consistent and factual basis. We’re already fighting against too much personal bias and political agendas. It can quickly push things towards inaccuracy if you let it.”
Government should stay out, said Alex Teague, senior vice president and chief operating officer for Limoneira, Santa Paula, Calif.
“It is a market-driven effort and the federal government’s history is regulation without accountability.”
Gary Hilberg, chief sustainability officer for Local Bounti, said there are two issues with a government program. One, he said there is consumer confusion and bias. Secondly, Hilberg said metrics could make sense for larger carbon emitters rather than for produce growers. That, he said, could diminish the value of the program.
“I am optimistic, but at what cost?” said Eric Valenzuela, director of food safety and sustainability at California Giant, Watsonville.
The Packer’s Sustainability Coverage
