Packaging proposal spells trouble, says Washington potato group

A new proposal in the Washington state legislature would toss out federal food packaging rules and make it more difficult to market the state’s potatoes, one grower group says.

Packaging
Packaging-overview_web_0.png
(File image)

A new proposal in the Washington state legislature would toss out federal food packaging rules and make it more difficult to market the state’s potatoes, one grower group says.

While grocery store produce tables are stacked high with potatoes in 5- and 10-pound perforated plastic bags, the Washington Recycling and Packaging (WRAP) Act would require potato packers to join a “producer responsibility organization” (PRO) and pay fees for the production and use of their branded bagged produce, according to a news release from the Washington State Potato Commission.

The bill also requires bag producers to change the composition of their bags to include increasing amounts of post-consumer recycled materials, the release said. A similar piece of legislation was passed in California in 2022.

However, the release said the California legislation has one distinct difference: fresh produce is exempt from the requirements. California S. 54 states: “Neither the department nor a PRO shall impose a postconsumer recycled content requirement for covered material for fresh produce.”

The reason, the release says, is because the Food and Drug Administration, which governs food packaging, requires food packaging to be “cleanable” or for “single-use” that is “unlikely to support growth or transfer of bacteria.”

The perforations in plastic potato bags promote air circulation and help to regulate storage temperatures to keep the potatoes fresh. They also make the bags “single use,” the release said.

The release said authors of the Washington bill note there are regulatory authorities that may supersede the bill language. It reads, “A producer regulatory organization must show that post-consumer recycled material rates would violate federal law” or show the amount of post-consumer recycled material in a bag is not “technologically feasible.” The release said that these organizations would still be required to register producers and users of these plastics, as well as track and report their usage on a public website.

“Environmental stewardship is important but needs practical solutions,” the commission said in the release. “Creating regulations that put our local potato producers in violation of federal fresh produce packaging rules puts them in a no-win situation.”

The Packer logo (567x120)
Related Stories
While compostable packaging offers promising circular sustainability for produce, widespread adoption remains constrained by higher costs and performance trade-offs.
Several deadlines set by California’s SB 54 — the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act — have come and gone, but some producers impacted by the controversial legislation still question its feasibility.
A federal injunction freezes California’s recycling symbol ban, offering momentary relief to produce shippers caught in a legal tug of war over packaging fees and labeling rules.
Read Next
As summer market volatility forces growers to adjust harvest schedules and field acreage, industry leaders call on retailers to help share food safety facts and restore stability ahead of winter planting.
Get Daily News
GET MARKET ALERTS
Get News & Markets App