John Phipps: Can the Push for More Solar Energy and Farmland Coexist?

Some farmers are concerned about the possibility of losing farmland to energy projects like wind and solar. John Phipps points out some major misconceptions about the placement of solar projects.

From Kody Light in Gaston, Indiana concerning farmland loss:

“What about all the Industrial Scale Solar Projects being built and proposed? We have not even begun to count farmland (900 acre + tracts) that has been or will be lost to Industrial Scale Solar! That land we all know will NEVER be farmed again. Want to say it will be farmed again? Show me a fully successful decommissioned project in the US that is being farmed! What will the math look like in the next 5 to 10 years with vast tracts of land being destroyed by industrial solar so a few large companies and landowners can profit huge!”

This is another common misperception about size. There have been multiple calculations for exactly this problem. The most conservative estimate of the area needed in 22,000 square miles or 14 million acres to provide 100% of our electricity.

This is for 14% efficient panels, but current panels are already over 20% which would sharply reduce the number. Generating all power from only farmland would use 1.5% of farmland, or about 4% of cropland.

For perspective, we have 22 million acres in CRP. My guess is less than a few percent will be on farmland for several reasons. First, the most optimistic projection is 50% by 2050. Our major crop production areas are not the best place to put industrial solar – the Southwest is, by far. Installations need to be reasonably close to hi-voltage transmission lines and substations, normally less than 2 miles. About 20% of solar installation are residential – roofs. It is easier and cheaper to site solar arrays on non-farmland, like deserts.

There is no government involvement in acquiring energy sites. It is done by agreement with landowners and energy developers, not imminent domain, or government seizure. Consequently, much of the outrage felt by farmers arises from not owning the land.

As for ground never being farmed again, I could not find an industrial farmland array that has been decommissioned, but we learned from nuclear power those expenses must be set aside at construction. Virtually all decommissioned solar installations have been industrial rooftops and residences.

Finally, while a tiny number of landowners do profit handsomely, it is a right of ownership. The area involved cannot be remotely described as “vast”. It’s a large country; there’s room for solar.

The Packer logo (567x120)
Related Stories
By pairing electrolyte access with shade and rest, the upgraded rules give agricultural workers critical defense against chronic heat-related health risks.
Several deadlines set by California’s SB 54 — the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act — have come and gone, but some producers impacted by the controversial legislation still question its feasibility.
By leveraging complete vertical integration from field-level technical innovation to store shelf, the company aims to transform dates from commodity to iconic health and wellness brand.
Read Next
With 300 truckloads of vegetables crossing the border daily, the executive director for the Ontario Greenhouse Vegetable Growers,outlines why protecting stable access to U.S. consumers supports affordable, year-round produce for Canadians.
Get Daily News
GET MARKET ALERTS
Get News & Markets App